Comparison of Gait parameters among the adults (18-24) with and without flatfoot – A Cross sectional study

Authors

  • Nayan Fulewale Dr. Vithalrao Vikhe Patil college of Physiotherapy
  • Dr. Deepak Anap (PT)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46858/VIMSJPT.3205

Abstract

Background: Flat foot is a common deformity in which the medial longitudinal arch is eliminated or reduced, subtalar joint is pronated and the calcaneus achieves valgus position under- weight bearing conditions. Any feet disorder can alter the biomechanics of the entire lower limb. The aim of the study was to compare the gait parameters (Cadence, stride length, step length and pace) among the adults (18-24) with and without flat foot.

Methodology: It was a cross-sectional study with 3 months duration. Total 56 young adults (18-24) with and without flatfoot were recruited with purposive sampling method. the categorization of the type of arch using Arch-Height index. The Outcome measures were Gait parameters (cadence, distance walked in one minute, speed, step length, stride length) which were noted by pedometer of Smart watch and stride length, step length by using formula using cadence and distance findings. Result: Comparison analysis was done by using unpaired t-test. On comparison of various Gait parameters between normal and flat foot individuals such as cadence (p=0.7), distance walked in one minute (p= 0.96), speed (p=0.78), step length (p= 0.98), stride length (p= 0.92), there was no significant difference between two groups. Conclusion: The study concludes that there is no difference in gait parameters between flatfoot and normal foot.

Keywords:

Flatfoot, Gait parameters, young adults

References

Aboutorabi A, Saeedi H, Kamali M, Farahmand B, Eshraghi A, Dolagh RS. Immediate effect of orthopedic shoe and functional foot orthosis on center of pressure displacement and gait parameters in juvenile flexible flat foot. Prosthetics and orthotics international. 2014 Jun;38(3):218-23.

Volpon JB. Footprint analysis during the growth period. Journal of pediatric orthopedics. 1994;14(1):83-5.

Bordelon RL, Lusskin R. Correction of hypermobile flatfoot in children by molded insert. Foot & ankle. 1980 Nov;1(3):143-50.

Pfeiffer M, Kotz R, Ledl T, Hauser G, Sluga M. Prevalence of flat foot in preschool-aged children. Pediatrics. 2006 Aug 1;118(2):634-9.

Leung AK, Mak AF, Evans JH. Biomechanical gait evaluation of the immediate effect of orthotic treatment for flexible flat foot. Prosthetics and orthotics international. 1998 Apr;22(1):25-34.

Anderson RB, Davis WH. Management of the adult flatfoot deformity. Foot and ankle disorders. 2000;2:518-38.

Caravaggi P, Leardini A, Crompton R. Kinematic correlates of walking cadence in the foot. Journal of biomechanics. 2010 Aug 26;43(12):2425-33.

Paw?owska K, Paw?owski J, Mazurek T, Piotr A, Ko?odziej ?, Grochulska A. Feet deformities in patients with hip osteoarthritis. Medical Research Journal. 2019;4(2):67-71.

Jacobs B. Toe walking, flat feet and bow legs, in-toeing and out-toeing. Paediatrics and Child Health. 2010 May 1;20(5):221-4.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

Issue

Section

Article

How to Cite

Fulewale, N., & Anap (PT), D. D. (2021). Comparison of Gait parameters among the adults (18-24) with and without flatfoot – A Cross sectional study. VIMS JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 3(2), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.46858/VIMSJPT.3205