The Characteristics of Longitudinal Studies Analysing Functional Recovery in Patients with Stroke - A Systematic Review

Authors

  • Mukund Shubhangi Intern, DVVPF's COllege of Physiotherapy, Ahmednagar
  • Ganvir Suvarna Prof. and HOD
  • Harishchandre Maheshwari Asso. Prof. DVVPFs, College of Physiotherapy, Ahmednagar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46858/VIMSJPT.6102

Keywords:

Functional recovery, Longitudinal study, Stroke.  

Abstract

Background- Stroke is a common neurological disorder that represents a major cause of disability. Stroke is a major cause of short-term functional impairment in developed countries, in absence of adequate treatment and rehabilitation which can lead to significant long-term functional impairment. Objectives- This present systematic review is aimed to explore the literature-related longitudinal studies conducted on patients with Stroke concerning the number of subjects included, follow-up time, number of centers involved, percentage of dropouts, and type of outcome measures used to assess the effect of treatment. Methods- PubMed databases were searched to identify eligible studies using the keywords Stroke, Functional recovery, and longitudinal studies. Only longitudinal studies published in the last 12 years (2010-2022) were included in this review. Results- Nine studies were included in the review conducted on functional recovery in Stroke patients. All studies investigated Functional recovery over a longer period using different outcome measures with different follow-up times. It was found that functional recovery occurs over a longer period. Conclusion- This review concludes that multicentric longitudinal studies with specifically related outcome measures focus on activity & participation as stated in ICF guidelines with an option of telerehabilitation in the chronic stage to reduce attrition rate may be undertaken by the researcher in the field of Stroke rehabilitation. 

Keywords: Functional recovery, Longitudinal study, Stroke.

 

References

Banerjee TK, Das SK. Epidemiology of stroke in India. Neurology Asia. 2006 Jun;11:1-4

Johnson CO, Nguyen M, Roth GA, Nichols E, Alam T, Abate D, Abd-Allah F, Abdelalim A, Abraha HN, Abu-Rmeileh NM, Adebayo OM. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet Neurology. 2019 May 1;18(5):439-58.

Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, Delling FN, Djousse L. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020 Mar 3;141(9):e139-596.

Kamalakannan S, Gudlavalleti AS, Gudlavalleti VS, Goenka S, Kuper H. Incidence & prevalence of stroke in India: A systematic review. The Indian journal of medical research. 2017 Aug;146(2):175.

MEDICA EM. Assessing functional recovery in the first 6 months after acute ischaemic stroke: a prospective, observational study. European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine. 2018 May 14.

Birchenall J, Térémetz M, Roca P, Lamy JC, Oppenheim C, Maier MA, Mas JL, Lamy C, Baron JC, Lindberg PG. Individual recovery profiles of manual dexterity, and relation to corticospinal lesion load and excitability after stroke–a longitudinal pilot study. Neurophysiologie Clinique. 2019 Apr 1;49(2):149-64.

Kwakkel G, Winters C, Van Wegen EE, Nijland RH, Van Kuijk AA, Visser-Meily A, De Groot J, De Vlugt E, Arendzen JH, Geurts AC, Meskers CG. Effects of unilateral upper limb training in two distinct prognostic groups early after stroke: the EXPLICIT-stroke randomized clinical trial. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. 2016 Oct;30(9):804-16.

Simpson L, Hayward K, McPeake M, Eng J. An updated distribution of upper limb weakness post stroke: are fewer people experiencing arm weakness today? International Journal of Stroke 2018 Oct 1 (Vol. 13, pp. 41-41). 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND: SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD.

Pollock A, St George B, Fenton M, Firkins L. Top 10 research priorities relating to life after stroke–consensus from stroke survivors, caregivers, and health professionals. International Journal of Stroke. 2014 Apr;9(3):313-20.

Feydy A, Carlier R, Roby-Brami A, Bussel B, Cazalis F, Pierot L, Burnod Y, Maier MA. A longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke: recruitment and focusing of brain activation. Stroke. 2002 Jun 1;33(6):1610-7.

Yan J, Guo X, Jin Z, Sun J, Shen L, Tong S. Cognitive alterations in motor imagery process after left hemispheric ischemic stroke.

Buch ER, Rizk S, Nicolo P, Cohen LG, Schnider A, Guggisberg AG. Predicting motor improvement after stroke with clinical assessment and diffusion tensor imaging. Neurology. 2016 May 17;86(20):1924-5.

Stinear CM, Byblow WD, Ackerley SJ, Smith MC, Borges VM, Barber PA. Proportional motor recovery after stroke: implications for trial design. Stroke. 2017 Mar;48(3):795-8.

Gustavson K, von Soest T, Karevold E, Røysamb E. Attrition and generalizability in longitudinal studies: findings from a 15-year population-based study and a Monte Carlo simulation study. BMC public health. 2012 Dec;12(1):1-1.

Plantin J, Verneau M, Godbolt AK, Pennati GV, Laurencikas E, Johansson B, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Baron JC, Borg J, Lindberg PG. Recovery and prediction of bimanual hand use after stroke. Neurology. 2021 Aug 17;97(7):e706-19.

Wu Z, Cheng L, Yang GY, Tong S, Sun J, Miao F. Functional activation-informed structural changes during stroke recovery: a longitudinal MRI study. BioMed research international. 2017 Oct 24;2017.

López-Espuela F, Pedrera-Zamorano JD, Jiménez-Caballero PE, Ramírez-Moreno JM, Portilla-Cuenca JC, Lavado-García JM, Casado-Naranjo I. Functional status and disability in patients after acute stroke: a longitudinal study. American journal of critical care. 2016 Mar;25(2):144-51.

Veldema J, Bösl K, Nowak DA. Cortico-spinal excitability and hand motor recovery in stroke: a longitudinal study. Journal of neurology. 2018 May;265(5):1071-8.

Buvarp D, Rafsten L, Sunnerhagen KS. Predicting longitudinal progression in functional mobility after stroke: a prospective cohort study. Stroke. 2020 Jul;51(7):2179-87.

Chan L, Sandel ME, Jette AM, Appelman J, Brandt DE, Cheng P, TeSelle M, Delmonico R, Terdiman JF, Rasch EK. Does the postacute care site matter? A longitudinal study assessing functional recovery after a stroke. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2013 Apr 1;94(4):622-9.

Birchenall J, Térémetz M, Roca P, Lamy JC, Oppenheim C, Maier MA, Mas JL, Lamy C, Baron JC, Lindberg PG. Individual recovery profiles of manual dexterity, and relation to corticospinal lesion load and excitability after stroke–a longitudinal pilot study. Neurophysiologie Clinique. 2019 Apr 1;49(2):149-64.

Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf PA, Kase CS, Gresham GE, Kannel WB, D'Agostino RB. Time course of functional recovery after stroke: the Framingham study. Journal of Neurologic Rehabilitation. 1989 Jun;3(2):65-70.

Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Twisk J. Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke. Stroke. 2006 Sep 1;37(9):2348-53.

Messerer D, Porzsolt F, Hasford J, Neiss A. Advantages and problems of multicenter therapy studies exemplified by a study of the treatment of metastasizing renal cell carcinoma with recombinant interferon-alpha-2c. Onkologie. 1987 Feb 1;10(1):43-9.

Hogan JW, Roy J, Korkontzelou C. Handling drop?out in longitudinal studies. Statistics in medicine. 2004 May 15;23(9):1455-97.

Leeuw ED. Dropout in longitudinal studies: Strategies to limit the problem.

Kollen B, Kwakkel G, Lindeman E. Functional recovery after stroke: a review of current developments in stroke rehabilitation research. Reviews on recent clinical trials. 2006 Jan 1;1(1):75-80.

Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. 2002 Sep;16(3):232-40.

Quinn TJ, Langhorne P, Stott DJ. Barthel index for stroke trials: development, properties, and application. Stroke. 2011 Apr;42(4):1146-51.

Borasio GD. The role of palliative care in patients with neurological diseases. Nature reviews Neurology. 2013 May;9(5):292-5.

Alawieh A, Zhao J, Feng W. Factors affecting post-stroke motor recovery: implications on Neurotherapy after brain injury. Behavioral brain research. 2018 Mar 15;340:94-101.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Shubhangi, M., Suvarna , G., & Maheshwari, H. (2024). The Characteristics of Longitudinal Studies Analysing Functional Recovery in Patients with Stroke - A Systematic Review. VIMS JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 6(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.46858/VIMSJPT.6102

Issue

Section

Review Article